Аннотация:ABSTRACT Aquatic environmental DNA (eDNA) surveys are transforming how we monitor marine ecosystems. The time-consuming pre-processing step of active filtration, however, remains a bottleneck. Hence, new approaches omitting active filtration are in great demand. One exciting prospect is to use the filtering power of invertebrates to collect eDNA. While proof-of-concept has been achieved, comparative studies between aquatic and filter feeder eDNA signals are lacking. Here, we investigated the differences among four eDNA sources (water; bivalves; sponges; and ethanol in which filter-feeding organisms were stored) along a vertical transect in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand using three metabarcoding primers (fish (16S); MiFish-E/U). While concurrent SCUBA diver observations validated eDNA results, laboratory trials corroborated in-field bivalve eDNA detection results. Combined, eDNA sources detected 59 vertebrates, while divers observed eight fish species. There were no significant differences in alpha and beta diversity between water and sponge eDNA and both sources were highly correlated. Vertebrate eDNA was detected in ethanol, although only a reduced number of species were detected. Bivalves failed to reliably detect eDNA in both field and mesocosm experiments. While additional research into filter feeder eDNA accumulation efficiency is essential, our results provide strong evidence for the potential of incorporating sponges into eDNA surveys.
