MP20-03 PATIENT EXPERIENCE FOR TRANSPERINEAL BIOPSY UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS TRANSRECTAL BIOPSY: RESULTS FROM THE MICHIGAN UROLOGICAL SURGERY IMPROVEMENT COLLABORATIVEстатья из журнала
Аннотация: You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Detection & Screening II (MP20)1 Apr 2020MP20-03 PATIENT EXPERIENCE FOR TRANSPERINEAL BIOPSY UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS TRANSRECTAL BIOPSY: RESULTS FROM THE MICHIGAN UROLOGICAL SURGERY IMPROVEMENT COLLABORATIVE Stephanie Ferrante*, Scott Hawken, James Montie, David Miller, Richard C. Wu, Chad Ellimoottil, Lindsey Herrel, Craig Rogers, Amit Patel, J. Rene Frontera, Adam Walker, Arvin George, and for the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative Stephanie Ferrante*Stephanie Ferrante* More articles by this author , Scott HawkenScott Hawken More articles by this author , James MontieJames Montie More articles by this author , David MillerDavid Miller More articles by this author , Richard C. WuRichard C. Wu More articles by this author , Chad EllimoottilChad Ellimoottil More articles by this author , Lindsey HerrelLindsey Herrel More articles by this author , Craig RogersCraig Rogers More articles by this author , Amit PatelAmit Patel More articles by this author , J. Rene FronteraJ. Rene Frontera More articles by this author , Adam WalkerAdam Walker More articles by this author , Arvin GeorgeArvin George More articles by this author , and for the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000853.03AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Transperineal biopsy (TPbx) has been found to be feasible with equivalent cancer detection rate compared to transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRbx), however patient experience remains unknown. We aim to assess patient experience with in-office TPbx under local anesthesia within the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC). METHODS: MUSIC is a physician-lead quality improvement consortium comprised of 90% of urologists in Michigan. From 3/2019 - 10/2019 patients at 4 MUSIC sites completed a survey assessing overall pain, pain during specific portions of the procedure, and willingness to undergo a repeat procedure if medically necessary. Experience was assessed using a validated visual analogue pain scale (VAS). Identical surveys were given to a control group of patients undergoing TRbx at a single site. Univariate analysis was used to compare responses between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 190 TPbx and 150 TRbx responses were included. Mean VAS for overall experience was significantly higher for TPbx (3.74 vs 3.03, p=0.01) [Figure 1]. This was predominantly driven by greater discomfort during local anesthetic administration (3.77 vs 2.35, p<0.001) and positioning (0.99 vs 0.59, p=0.01) during TPbx. However, there was not significant variation in mean overall VAS across sites, or by provider within a single site subgroup analysis with the highest volume. Discomfort was greatest during TRbx during probe insertion (mean VAS 2.86). There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to probe insertion, prostate sampling or willingness to undergo a repeat procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Men experience greater discomfort during TPbx when compared to TRbx though the absolute difference is small and of questionable clinical relevance. This was not related to minor differences in technique by site or provider. Anesthetic administration scores were similar between the groups suggesting adequate anesthesia. TPbx under local anesthesia is well tolerated and strategies aimed toward minimizing discomfort during administration of local anesthetic can improve patient experience during TPbx. Source of Funding: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 203Issue Supplement 4April 2020Page: e307-e308 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Stephanie Ferrante* More articles by this author Scott Hawken More articles by this author James Montie More articles by this author David Miller More articles by this author Richard C. Wu More articles by this author Chad Ellimoottil More articles by this author Lindsey Herrel More articles by this author Craig Rogers More articles by this author Amit Patel More articles by this author J. Rene Frontera More articles by this author Adam Walker More articles by this author Arvin George More articles by this author for the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Год издания: 2020
Авторы: Stephanie Ferrante, Scott Hawken, James E. Montie, David A. Miller, Richard C. Wu, Chad Ellimoottil, Lindsey A. Herrel, Craig Rogers, Amit Patel, J. Rene Frontera, Adam Walker, Arvin K. George
Издательство: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Источник: The Journal of Urology
Ключевые слова: Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques, Diversity and Career in Medicine
Открытый доступ: bronze
Том: 203
Выпуск: Supplement 4