1. Главная
  2. Ресурсы
  3. Библиотечный поиск
Decompression aloneversus fusion andCoflex in thetreatment of lumbardegenerative disease Yunpeng FanLiulong Zhu2020 год

Decompression alone versus fusion and Coflex in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease
review

Полный текстСтраница публикацииПубликация в OpenAlex
Аннотация: Lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) is a very common disease. And decompression alone, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and interspinous device (Coflex) are generally accepted surgical techniques. However, the effectiveness and safety of the above techniques are still not clear. Network meta-analysis a comprehensive technique can compare multiple treatments based on indirect dates and all interventions are evaluated and ranked simultaneously. To figure out this problem and offer a better choice for LDD, we performed this network meta-analysis.PubMed and WanFang databases were searched based on the following key words, "Coflex," "decompression," "PLIF," "Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion," "Coflex" "Lumbar interbody Fusion." Then the studies were sorted out on the basis of inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. A network meta-analysis was performed using The University of Auckland, Auckland city, New Zealand R 3.5.3 software.A total of 10 eligible literatures were finally screened, including 946 patients. All studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Compared with decompression alone group, there were no significant differences of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in Coflex and lumbar interbody fusion groups after surgery. However, Coflex and PLIF were better in decreasing Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score compared with decompression alone. Furthermore, we found Coflex have a less complication incidence rate.Compared with decompression alone, Coflex and lumbar interbody fusion had the similar effectiveness in improving lumbar function and quality of life. However, the latter 2 techniques were better in relieving pain. Furthermore, Coflex included a lower complication incidence rate. So we suggested that Coflex technique was a better choice to cue lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).Systematic review and meta-analysis, level I.
Год издания: 2020
Авторы: Yunpeng Fan, Liulong Zhu
Издательство: Wolters Kluwer
Источник: Medicine
Ключевые слова: Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology, Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Другие ссылки: Medicine (HTML)
journals.lww.com (HTML)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (PDF)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (HTML)
PubMed Central (HTML)
PubMed (HTML)