Cultural Values: Can They Explain Differences in Health Utilities between Countries?статья из журнала
Аннотация: Introduction. Health utilities are widely used in health care. The distributions of utilities differ between countries; some countries more often report worse than dead health states, while mild states are valued more or less the same. We hypothesize that cultural values explain these country-related utility differences. Research Question. What is the effect of sociodemographic background, methodological factors, and cultural values on differences in health utilities? Methods and Analyses. Time tradeoff data from 28 EQ-5D valuation studies were analyzed, together with their sociodemographic variables. The dependent variable was [Formula: see text], the utility difference between mild and severe states. Country-specific cultural variables were taken from the World Values Survey. Multilevel models were used to analyze the effect of sociodemographic background, methodology (3L v. 5L), and cultural values on [Formula: see text]. Intraclass correlation (ICC) for country variation was used to assess the impact of the predicting variables on the variation between countries. Results. Substantial variation in [Formula: see text] was found between countries. Adding cultural values did not reduce ICCs for country variation. Sociodemographic background variables were only weakly associated with [Formula: see text] and did not affect the ICC. [Formula: see text] was 0.118 smaller for EQ-5D-5L studies. Discussion. [Formula: see text] varies between countries. These differences were not explained by national cultural values. In conclusion, despite correction for various variables, utility differences between countries remain substantial and unexplained. This justifies the use of country-specific value sets for instruments such as the EQ-5D.
Год издания: 2019
Авторы: Bram Roudijk, A. Rogier T. Donders, Peep F. M. Stalmeier, Nan Luo, Rosalie Viney, Mônica Viégas Andrade, Claire Gudex, Gérard de Pouvourville, Wolfgang Greiner, L Scalone, Aki Tsuchiya, Dominik Golicki, Pedro Lopes Ferreira, Valentina Prevolnik Rupel, Xavier Badı́a, Ching‐Lin Hsieh, Jennifer Jelsma, Marisa Santos, Feng Xie, Fredrick Dermawan Purba, Shunya Ikeda, Takeru Shiroiwa, Elly Stolk, Min‐Woo Jo, Juan-Manuel Ramos-Goñi, Federico Augustovski, Lucila Rey‐Ares, Nancy Devlin, Koonal Shah, Juntana Pattanaphesaj, Sirinart Tongsiri
Издательство: SAGE Publishing
Источник: Medical Decision Making
Ключевые слова: Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Healthcare Systems and Reforms, Healthcare Policy and Management
Другие ссылки: Medical Decision Making (PDF)
Medical Decision Making (HTML)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (PDF)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (HTML)
CONICET Digital (CONICET) (PDF)
CONICET Digital (CONICET) (HTML)
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (PDF)
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (HTML)
Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (HTML)
PubMed Central (HTML)
Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (PDF)
Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (HTML)
PubMed (HTML)
Medical Decision Making (HTML)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (PDF)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (HTML)
CONICET Digital (CONICET) (PDF)
CONICET Digital (CONICET) (HTML)
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (PDF)
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (HTML)
Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (HTML)
PubMed Central (HTML)
Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (PDF)
Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (HTML)
PubMed (HTML)
Открытый доступ: hybrid
Том: 39
Выпуск: 5
Страницы: 605–616