1. Главная
  2. Ресурсы
  3. Библиотечный поиск
Effectiveness of theStand More AT (SMArT)Work intervention:cluster randomisedcontrolled trial Charlotte L. EdwardsonTom YatesStuart Biddle2018 год

Effectiveness of the Stand More AT (SMArT) Work intervention: cluster randomised controlled trial
статья из журнала

Полный текстСтраница публикацииПубликация в OpenAlex
Аннотация: Abstract Objectives To evaluate the impact of a multicomponent intervention (Stand More AT (SMArT) Work) designed to reduce sitting time on short (three months), medium (six months), and longer term (12 months) changes in occupational, daily, and prolonged sitting, standing, and physical activity, and physical, psychological, and work related health. Design Cluster two arm randomised controlled trial. Setting National Health Service trust, England. Participants 37 office clusters (146 participants) of desk based workers: 19 clusters (77 participants) were randomised to the intervention and 18 (69 participants) to control. Interventions The intervention group received a height adjustable workstation, a brief seminar with supporting leaflet, workstation instructions with sitting and standing targets, feedback on sitting and physical activity at three time points, posters, action planning and goal setting booklet, self monitoring and prompt tool, and coaching sessions (month 1 and every three months thereafter). The control group continued with usual practice. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was occupational sitting time (thigh worn accelerometer). Secondary outcomes were objectively measured daily sitting, prolonged sitting (≥30 minutes), and standing time, physical activity, musculoskeletal problems, self reported work related health (job performance, job satisfaction, work engagement, occupational fatigue, sickness presenteeism, and sickness absenteeism), cognitive function, and self reported psychological measures (mood and affective states, quality of life) assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Data were analysed using generalised estimating equation models, accounting for clustering. Results A significant difference between groups (in favour of the intervention group) was found in occupational sitting time at 12 months (−83.28 min/workday, 95% confidence interval −116.57 to −49.98, P=0.001). Differences between groups (in favour of the intervention group compared with control) were observed for occupational sitting time at three months (−50.62 min/workday, −78.71 to −22.54, P<0.001) and six months (−64.40 min/workday, −97.31 to −31.50, P<0.001) and daily sitting time at six months (−59.32 min/day, −88.40 to −30.25, P<0.001) and 12 months (−82.39 min/day, −114.54 to −50.26, P=0.001). Group differences (in favour of the intervention group compared with control) were found for prolonged sitting time, standing time, job performance, work engagement, occupational fatigue, sickness presenteeism, daily anxiety, and quality of life. No differences were seen for sickness absenteeism. Conclusions SMArT Work successfully reduced sitting time over the short, medium, and longer term, and positive changes were observed in work related and psychological health. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10967042 .
Год издания: 2018
Авторы: Charlotte L. Edwardson, Tom Yates, Stuart Biddle, Melanie J. Davies, David W. Dunstan, Dale Esliger, Laura J. Gray, Benjamin Jackson, Sophie O'Connell, Ghazala Waheed, Fehmidah Munir
Издательство: BMJ
Источник: BMJ
Ключевые слова: Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, Workplace Health and Well-being, Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Другие ссылки: BMJ (PDF)
BMJ (HTML)
Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (HTML)
Own your potential (DEAKIN) (PDF)
Own your potential (DEAKIN) (HTML)
Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (PDF)
Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (HTML)
Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (PDF)
Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (HTML)
Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (PDF)
Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (HTML)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (HTML)
PubMed Central (HTML)
VU Research Repository (Victoria University) (PDF)
VU Research Repository (Victoria University) (HTML)
USQ EPrints (University of South Queensland) (HTML)
PubMed (HTML)