Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation on Tracheal Reintubation Among Patients With Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Following Abdominal Surgeryстатья из журнала
Аннотация: It has not been established whether noninvasive ventilation (NIV) reduces the need for invasive mechanical ventilation in patients who develop hypoxemic acute respiratory failure after abdominal surgery.To evaluate whether noninvasive ventilation improves outcomes among patients developing hypoxemic acute respiratory failure after abdominal surgery.Multicenter, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial conducted between May 2013 and September 2014 in 20 French intensive care units among 293 patients who had undergone abdominal surgery and developed hypoxemic respiratory failure (partial oxygen pressure <60 mm Hg or oxygen saturation [SpO2] ≤90% when breathing room air or <80 mm Hg when breathing 15 L/min of oxygen, plus either [1] a respiratory rate above 30/min or [2] clinical signs suggestive of intense respiratory muscle work and/or labored breathing) if it occurred within 7 days after surgical procedure.Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard oxygen therapy (up to 15 L/min to maintain SpO2 of 94% or higher) (n = 145) or NIV delivered via facial mask (inspiratory pressure support level, 5-15 cm H2O; positive end-expiratory pressure, 5-10 cm H2O; fraction of inspired oxygen titrated to maintain SpO2 ≥94%) (n = 148).The primary outcome was tracheal reintubation for any cause within 7 days of randomization. Secondary outcomes were gas exchange, invasive ventilation-free days at day 30, health care-associated infections, and 90-day mortality.Among the 293 patients (mean age, 63.4 [SD, 13.8] years; n=224 men) included in the intention-to-treat analysis, reintubation occurred in 49 of 148 (33.1%) in the NIV group and in 66 of 145 (45.5%) in the standard oxygen therapy group within+ 7 days after randomization (absolute difference, -12.4%; 95% CI, -23.5% to -1.3%; P = .03). Noninvasive ventilation was associated with significantly more invasive ventilation-free days compared with standard oxygen therapy (25.4 vs 23.2 days; absolute difference, -2.2 days; 95% CI, -0.1 to 4.6 days; P = .04), while fewer patients developed health care-associated infections (43/137 [31.4%] vs 63/128 [49.2%]; absolute difference, -17.8%; 95% CI, -30.2% to -5.4%; P = .003). At 90 days, 22 of 148 patients (14.9%) in the NIV group and 31 of 144 (21.5%) in the standard oxygen therapy group had died (absolute difference, -6.5%; 95% CI, -16.0% to 3.0%; P = .15). There were no significant differences in gas exchange.Among patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure following abdominal surgery, use of NIV compared with standard oxygen therapy reduced the risk of tracheal reintubation within 7 days. These findings support use of NIV in this setting.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01971892.
Год издания: 2016
Авторы: Samir Jaber, Thomas Lescot, Emmanuel Futier, Cathérine Paugam‐Burtz, Philippe Séguin, Martine Ferrandière, Sigismond Lasocki, Olivier Mimoz, Baptiste Hengy, Antoine Sannini, Julien Pottecher, Paër-Sélim Abback, Béatrice Riu, Fouad Belafia, Jean‐Michel Constantin, Élodie Masseret, Marc Beaussier, Daniel Verzilli, Audrey De Jong, Gérald Chanques, Laurent Brochard, Nicolas Molinari
Издательство: American Medical Association
Источник: JAMA
Ключевые слова: Respiratory Support and Mechanisms, Airway Management and Intubation Techniques, Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Другие ссылки: JAMA (PDF)
JAMA (HTML)
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (PDF)
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (HTML)
univ-rennes.hal.science (HTML)
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (HTML)
univ-rennes.hal.science (HTML)
univOAK (4 institutions : Université de Strasbourg, Université de Haute Alsace, INSA Strasbourg, Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg) (PDF)
univOAK (4 institutions : Université de Strasbourg, Université de Haute Alsace, INSA Strasbourg, Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg) (HTML)
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (HTML)
PubMed (HTML)
JAMA (HTML)
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (PDF)
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (HTML)
univ-rennes.hal.science (HTML)
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (HTML)
univ-rennes.hal.science (HTML)
univOAK (4 institutions : Université de Strasbourg, Université de Haute Alsace, INSA Strasbourg, Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg) (PDF)
univOAK (4 institutions : Université de Strasbourg, Université de Haute Alsace, INSA Strasbourg, Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg) (HTML)
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (HTML)
PubMed (HTML)
Открытый доступ: bronze
Том: 315
Выпуск: 13
Страницы: 1345–1345