Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanitiesстатья из журнала
Аннотация: Moral agency is manifested in both the power to refrain from behaving inhumanely and the proactive power to behave humanely. Moral agency is embedded in a broader sociocognitive self theory encompassing self-organizing, proactive, self-reflective, and self-regulatory mechanisms rooted in personal standards linked to self-sanctions. The self-regulatory mechanisms governing moral conduct do not come into play unless they are activated, and there are many psychosocial maneuvers by which moral self-sanctions are selectively disengaged from inhumane conduct. The moral disengagement may center on the cognitive restructuring of inhumane conduct into a benign or worthy one by moral justification, sanitizing language, and advantageous comparison; disavowal of a sense of personal agency by diffusion or displacement of responsibility; disregarding or minimizing the injurious effects of one's actions; and attribution of blame to, and dehumanization of, those who are victimized. Many inhumanities operate through a supportive network of legitimate enterprises run by otherwise considerate people who contribute to destructive activities by disconnected subdivision of functions and diffusion of responsibility. Given the many mechanisms for disengaging moral control, civilized life requires, in addition to humane personal standards, safeguards built into social systems that uphold compassionate behavior and renounce cruelty.
Год издания: 1999
Авторы: Albert Bandura
Издательство: SAGE Publishing
Источник: Personality and Social Psychology Review
Ключевые слова: Psychology of Social Influence, Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies, Legal Issues in Education
Другие ссылки: Personality and Social Psychology Review (HTML)
PubMed (HTML)
PubMed (HTML)
Открытый доступ: closed
Том: 3
Выпуск: 3
Страницы: 193–209