1. Главная
  2. Ресурсы
  3. Библиотечный поиск
What's in a name?Qualitativedescription revisited Margarete Sandelowski2009 год

What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited
статья из журнала

Страница публикацииПубликация в OpenAlex
Аннотация: Abstract “Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description?” (Sandelowski, 2000) was written to critique the prevailing tendency in qualitative health research to claim the use of methods that were not actually used and to clarify a methodological approach rarely identified as a distinctive method. The article has generated several misconceptions, most notably that qualitative description requires no interpretation of data. At the root of these misconceptions is the persistent challenge of defining qualitative research methods. Qualitative description is a “distributed residual category” (Bowker & Star, 2000). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press) in the classification of these methods. Its value lies not only in the knowledge its use can produce, but also as a vehicle for presenting and treating research methods as living entities that resist simple classification. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Res Nurs Health 33:77–84, 2010
Год издания: 2009
Авторы: Margarete Sandelowski
Издательство: Wiley
Источник: Research in Nursing & Health
Ключевые слова: Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics, Data Analysis and Archiving, Health Policy Implementation Science
Другие ссылки: Research in Nursing & Health (HTML)
PubMed (HTML)