The History Learning Project: A Department "Decodes" Its Studentsстатья из журнала
Аннотация: It is a story replicated in many history classrooms during the course of a semester. Students have once again done poorly on an assignment or exam. Their essays are the sites of massive, undifferentiated data dumps. They have paraphrased primary sources instead of analyzing them, ignored argumentation, confused past and present, and failed completely to grasp the “otherness” of a different era. A few students, as always, have done extremely well, but many have done poorly. What is wrong with these students? How can a teacher help them understand history? These sorts of poor performance often result from a mismatch between what college history teachers expect of their students and what those students imagine their task to be. Most college professors learned how to be historians more or less by osmosis, without explicit instruction on how to perform many of the operations necessary to produce historical knowledge. They, like the minority of students who seem to perform historical tasks effortlessly, are naturals who have not had to reflect consciously on what they do automatically. As a result, professors often do not model for their students some of the most basic—and most essential—steps in historical analysis. As Sam Wineburg has noted, it is so habitual for historians to check the author and date of a passage before they begin reading it that they do not realize that such procedures are not natural for many of their students.1 Such intellectual maneuvers, unmarked by the professor and as invisible to the
Год издания: 2008
Издательство: Oxford University Press
Источник: Journal of American History
Ключевые слова: Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy, Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences, Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Открытый доступ: bronze
Том: 94
Выпуск: 4
Страницы: 1211–1224