The Diachronization of Narratologyстатья из журнала
Аннотация: In recent decades narrative theory has moved from its early structuralist stage to a phase in which it has opened itself to other methodologies and has thus widened its scope. Besides the "narratologies" collected in David Herman's recent volume (Narratologies), a great number of narratological praxeis have developed in the past twenty years. These mostly American orientations include feminist and queer narratology (Lanser; Mezei; Roof), psychoanalytic narratology (Brooks; Chambers), poststructuralist narratology (Gibson), and cultural studies narratology with a heavy emphasis on multicultural and postcolonial narrative (Doyle; Spurr; Fludernik, "When the Self is an Other"). These newer approaches have been flanked by a number of more traditional schools specializing in formal and theoretical questions familiar from Gérard Genette or F. K. Stanzel that are now treated with greater theoretical sophistication or applied to new areas of research. 1 Moreover, two main schools have emerged that continue the formal orientation of traditional narratology but extend it, on the one hand, to the newest linguistic and cognitive approaches; 2 and, on the other, to the new media (possible worlds theory as represented in the work of Marie-Laure Ryan). 3 The major developments in recent narrative theory have therefore concerned theoretical and systematic issues.
Год издания: 2003
Авторы: Monika Fludernik
Издательство: Ohio State University Press
Источник: Narrative
Ключевые слова: Narrative Theory and Analysis, Language, Metaphor, and Cognition, Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Открытый доступ: closed
Том: 11
Выпуск: 3
Страницы: 331–348