Аннотация:Development optimists in South Asia have argued that electoral politics and the reduced role of villages as centres of economic activity have largely put an end to exploitation by dominant castes. Although the political arrangements that have emerged out of these changes fall short of the idealized standards of civil society, various commentators have argued that they nevertheless benefit subordinate classes. Partha Chatterjee even argues that the ad hoc and extra‐legal nature of these political arrangements – which he terms ‘political society’ – actually serve popular enfranchisement better than the law‐bound activities of civil society, which he sees as captive to capital. On the basis of village ethnography from the Pakistani Punjab, I argue that political society is in fact integral to processes that dispossess people of their rights and to the reproduction of elite power. The paper illustrates how it is not the cold rationality of the state and the rule of law that disenfranchise subordinate classes, but their absence.
Ключевые слова:South Asian Studies and Conflicts, Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies, Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
