Applying cognitive linguistics : figurative language in use, constructions and typology / edited by Ana María Piquer-Píriz, Rafael Alejo-González, University of Extremadura.
библиография

Цифровые и тематические книжные коллекции издания

Содержание

  • Intro; Applying Cognitive Linguistics; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Applying Cognitive Linguistic: Identifying some current research foci; 1. Introduction; 2. From theoretical principles to practical applications; 3. Analyses of figurative language (metaphor and metonymy) in use; 4. Constructing meaning in language (L1 and L2 acquisition); 5. Typology; 6. Conclusions; References; Authors' address; Section I. Figurative language in use; Overt and covert uses of metaphor in the academic mentoring in English of Spanish undergraduates; 1. Introduction; 2. Background
  • 3. The data3.1 Participants and procedure; 3.2 Overview of the lecturer-student conversations; 4. Metaphors in the corpus of office hours' consultations; 4.1 Identification of covert and overt uses of metaphor in the corpus; 4.2 Lecturers' overt uses of metaphor; 4.3 Covert uses of metaphor; 5. Conclusions; References; Author's address; The interpretation of metonymy by Japanese learners of English; 1. Introduction; 2. Methodology; 3. Findings; 4. Conclusions; References; Appendix 1; Appendix 2; Appendix 3; Appendix 4; Authors' addresses
  • Methodological triangulation in the study of emotion: The case of 'anger' in three language groups1. Introduction; 2. Cross-cultural differences in anger experiences; 2.1 Research hypotheses; 3. Methods; 3.1 Anger situation-labelling task (Study 1); 3.2 Feature-based meaning profiles of anger nouns (Study 2); 3.3 Metaphorical construal of anger concepts (Study 3); 4. Results; 4.1 Word use in the anger situation-labelling task; 4.2 Differences in the feature-based profiles of anger nouns; 4.3 Differences in the metaphorical profiles of anger nouns; 5. Summary and discussion; 6. Conclusions
  • 2.2.1 Stimulus materials2.2.2 Procedure; 2.3 Results; 2.3.1 Exposure time; 2.3.2 Errors; 2.4 Discussion; 3. Experiment 2: Naming latency; 3.1 Participants; 3.2 Method; 3.2.1 Stimulus materials; 3.2.2 Procedure; 3.3 Results; 4. General discussion; 4.1 Recognition threshold; 4.2 Naming; 4.3 Comparison of findings with those from free association tasks; 4.4 Limitations; 4.5 Conclusions; References; Appendix A; The role of force dynamics and intentionality in the reconstruction of L2 verb meaning; 1. Introduction; 2. Force dynamics and intentionality in placement events; 3. Methodology

Похожие публикации

  • Mahlberg, Michaela, и др.
  • 2019 год
  • Ardoin, Sonja, и др.
  • 2021 год
  • Winters Margaret E.,
  • 2020 год
  • Sharma, Ghanshyam и др.
  • 2021 год
  • Rühlemann Christoph
  • 2020 год
  • Dąbrowska, Ewa, и др.
  • 2019 год
  • Busse, Beatrix, и др.
  • 2019 год

Показать ещё

  • Ibbotson Paul
  • Zenner, Eline, и др.
  • 2019 год
  • Bauer Laurie
  • 2021 год
  • Arigne, Viviane, и др.
  • 2018 год
  • Shin, Naomi Lapidus, и др.
  • 2018 год
  • Khalfaoui, Amel, и др.