Библиографическое описание:К вопросу о соотношении федеральных подзаконных актов и региональных законов / А. А. Петров, Д. С. Шинкевич. - Текст : непосредственный // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Право. - 2015. - № 2. - С. 5-13. - ISSN 2225-3513. - ISSN 2311-3693, DOI 10.17223/22253513/16/1. Перевод заглавия: On the problem of correlation between federal by-laws and regional laws
Аннотация:В статье анализируются вопросы иерархического соотношения федеральных подзаконных актов и региональных законов в сфере совместного ведения РФ и субъектов РФ. Отсутствие законодательного решения и должного доктринального осмысления конкуренции оснований определения юридической силы указанных актов отрицательно сказывается на эффективности правового регулирования.
Nowadays the problem of collisions between federal by-laws and regional laws (passed within the framework of competences of both the federation and its subjects) is an urgent one because the Constitution of the Russian Federation and current legislation have no criterion for their resolution and no doctrinal understanding of the above problem has been evolved yet. Therefore, facing the conflicts of norms many judges and other law enforcers can come to the completely opposite conclusions and this violates the principle of legality and influences the fates of people in directly. The nature of the given type of hierarchical collisions between norms is not an ordinary one- it is explained by two grounds for the definition of a legal force: the level of legal regulation (federal/regional) and the type of a normative legal act (law/by-law).The grounds compete, collisions arise but the problem of their resolution remains due to the lack of guidelines developed for law enforcers by theoretical jurisprudence. Such situation seems to be a dangerous one because the authorized subjects are vested with an indecently high degree of discretionary powers. But is it necessary to allow vagueness in law instead of avoiding it? This question should be asked among others. Are there any law enforcement common factors for the resolution of such collisions? Does their resolution depend on other factors e.g. a concrete subject sphere of an act (Labor law, Family law etc.), on their types or the type of law makers (Government decree, Presidential decree etc.)? The collisional gap will exist in the absence of answers to these questions. It is necessary to decide whether this gap needs filling and if "yes", what model is to be the most effective one. Having established all the above facts, we will be able to optimize legal regulation in the given sphere and ensure some degree of uniformity in law enforcement that is necessary for the subjects of legal communications.
Издательство:Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет, Томск
Источник:Вестник Томского государственного университета. Право
Выпуск:№ 2
Номера страниц:5-13
Держатель оригинала документа:Сибирский федеральный университет (г. Красноярск)
Количество экземпляров:
Твёрдая копия издания отсутствует в фонде библиотеки
