Библиографическое описание:Цели основного и дополнительных процессов доказывания по уголовным делам / А. С. Барабаш. - Текст : непосредственный // Уголовная юстиция. - 2013. - № 2. - С. 15-20. - ISSN 2308-8451. - ISSN 2411-1953. Перевод заглавия: Purposes of direct and indirect proof in criminal cases
Аннотация:В качестве цели уголовно-процессуального доказывания рассматриваются обстоятельства, подлежащие доказыванию, содержание которых закреплено в ст. 73 УПК РФ. Анализируя эту статью, автор обнаруживает много недостатков как в конструкции статьи, так и в изложении отдельных обстоятельств, подлежащих доказыванию. В результате предлагается редакция статей, закрепляющих цели основного и дополнительных процессов доказывания.
The paper describes circumstances subject to be proven, the content of which is fixed by Art. 73 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation as the purpose of the criminal procedure proof. The author analyses the given article and finds drawbacks in its structure and in description of circumstances subject to be proven. The author offers amendments and addenda to the articles that fix the purposes of the direct and indirect proof. It is suggested to give a regulatory definition of the purpose of proof. Its result, an outcome of efforts of subjects of proof to accomplish a common purpose, is a success if each participant has a similar concept of the purpose of proof. The regulatory fixation of the purpose is possible, though the result of its achieving will be different, determined by the type of the offence whose circumstances are to be proven. Facts to be proven are the event of offence and the lack of it, guilt and innocence. Proving such circumstances is the grounds for termination of criminal cases, prosecution, for entering an acquittal due to the lack of evidence or offence. As these circumstances are important for making essential decisions on a case, they must be fixed in Art. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, which describes the purposes of the law enforcer, not in Art. 74, which describes proofs. Circumstances that contributed to the offence are also subject to clarification. Addressing from these positions to the text of Art. 73 of the of Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation does not allow to immediately identify the connection. The reason to it is the lack of circumstances that correlate with the elements of offence, or circumstances that are regular only for some offences or irrelevant for criminal legal treatment. There are circumstances that can be used both in and after establishment of facts, which are equivalent to an offence, and there are circumstances that should be taken into account when deciding on non-punishment, the so-called circumstances of exemption from criminal liability, and circumstances that may lead to exemption from punishment. They are described in detail in the Criminal Code.
Издательство:Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет, Томск
Ключевые слова:обстоятельства, подлежащие доказыванию, circumstances subject to be proven, purpose, purposes of direct and indirect proof, цель, цели основного и дополнительных процессов доказывания
