Библиографическое описание:ФОРМАЛЬНО-ЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ СТОРОНА ПРОЦЕССА ПРИНЯТИЯ ПОЗНАВАТЕЛЬНОГО УГОЛОВНО-ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНОГО РЕШЕНИЯ : доклад, тезисы доклада / К. В. Скоблик. - [Б. м. : б. и.], 2018. - Текст : непосредственный // ПРАВОВЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ УКРЕПЛЕНИЯ РОССИЙСКОЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОСТИ = LEGAL ISSUES OF STRENGTHENING RUSSIAN STATEHOOD : Сборник статей Всероссийской конференции / ПРАВОВЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ УКРЕПЛЕНИЯ РОССИЙСКОЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОСТИ (2017 ; 26.01 - 28.01 ; Томск). - Томск : Издательский Дом Томского государственного университета, 2018. - Часть 75. - С. 114-120. - ISBN 9785946216722, DOI 10.17223/9785946216678/14. Перевод заглавия: THE FORMAL-LOGICAL SIDE OF MAKING A COGNITIVE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DECISION
Аннотация:В статье, исходя из выделения в доказывании, наряду с диалектикологической стороной, формально-логической стороны, разбираются четре логических закона-требования. Показано их действие в процессе принятия познавательного уголовно-процессуального решения, обоснована необходимость их соблюдения субъектом доказывания. Параллельно критикуется часть существующих положений процессуальной доктрины по поднятому вопросу. В завершении указывается на организацию формальной логикой оценочной деятельности в доказывании и при принятии познавательного решения.
Specifying the mechanism of cognitive activity in the public model of the criminal procedure, the author identifies the formal logical and dialectical logical aspects in proving, whose implementation in unity ensures the formation of a cognitive solution. This solution is a project of a procedural action that influences reaching the aims of a public criminal trial determined by its purpose and principle (decision to refuse to initiate a criminal case, to terminate a criminal case or criminal prosecution, decision to accuse a person, to prepare the indictment, to make a verdict with regard to establishing the circumstances subject to proof, etc.) based on knowledge of the past. In this paper the author examined the operation of four logical laws (identity, contradiction, excluded third, sufficient grounds) in criminal procedure activities and showed their importance in the formation of informative logical evidence and circumstances subject to proof (Article 73 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation). This allowed him to assert the following: 1) thinking (assessing) activity in proving and making a cognitive decision - like any thinking activity - goes in a logical form and must not deviate from four formal logical laws; 2) in thinking (evaluating) activity when proving and making a cognitive decision, the content of evidence and circumstances subject to proof cannot be changed by an official arbitrarily, except for cases when such changes are made by practical (collection, verification) activity; 3) it is impossible that all information evidence, in whole or in part contradictory or inconsistent with each other, were all true. If one element is true / not true, the other is not true / true. This provision is true only if they are both not true. The paper ends with a thesis about the organisation of formal logic in terms of the logical form of evaluation in proving and in making a cognitive decision. The paper also expresses a critical attitude to a number of legal procedure experts' theses about the effect of the laws of formal logic in proving. The above conclusions are obtained on the basis of the idea of the Russian criminal procedure as public, using deduction (transfer of the provisions of logic to the criminal procedure), analysis (separation of parts of proving) and synthesis (the thesis of their unity).
