Библиографическое описание:Areas of global importance for conserving terrestrial biodiversity, carbon and water : научное издание / M. Jung [et al.]. - Текст : непосредственный // Nature Ecology and Evolution. - 2021. - № . - ISSN 2397-334X, DOI 10.1038/s41559-021-01528-7.
Аннотация:To meet the ambitious objectives of biodiversity and climate conventions, the international community requires clarity on how these objectives can be operationalized spatially and how multiple targets can be pursued concurrently. To support goal setting and the implementation of international strategies and action plans, spatial guidance is needed to identify which land areas have the potential to generate the greatest synergies between conserving biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people. Here we present results from a joint optimization that minimizes the number of threatened species, maximizes carbon retention and water quality regulation, and ranks terrestrial conservation priorities globally. We found that selecting the top-ranked 30% and 50% of terrestrial land area would conserve respectively 60.7% and 85.3% of the estimated total carbon stock and 66% and 89.8% of all clean water, in addition to meeting conservation targets for 57.9% and 79% of all species considered. Our data and prioritization further suggest that adequately conserving all species considered (vertebrates and plants) would require giving conservation attention to ~70% of the terrestrial land surface. If priority was given to biodiversity only, managing 30% of optimally located land area for conservation may be sufficient to meet conservation targets for 81.3% of the terrestrial plant and vertebrate species considered. Our results provide a global assessment of where land could be optimally managed for conservation. We discuss how such a spatial prioritization framework can support the implementation of the biodiversity and climate conventions.
Держатель оригинала документа:Betty and Gordon Moore Center for Science,Conservation International, Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program (BNR),International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Botanical Garden Research Institute of Rio de Janeiro, CEFE,Univ. Montpellier,CNRS,EPHE,IRD,Univ. Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Center for Biodiversity and Global Change,Yale University, Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE),Department of Biology,Aarhus University, Center for Macroecology,Evolution and Climate,GLOBE Institute,University of Copenhagen, Centro de Cambio Global UC,Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas,Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, CIBIO/InBIO,Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos da Universidade do Porto, Columbia University, CSIRO Land and Water, Departamento de Ecología,Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas,Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Department of Biological Sciences,Macquarie University, Department of Biological Sciences,Purdue University, Department of Biology and Biotechnologies,Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Biology,University of Kentucky, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,University of Arizona, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,University of Connecticut, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,Yale University, Department of Geography,Florida State University, Department of Geography,King’s College London, Department of Zoology,University of Cambridge, Environmental Change Institute,Centre for the Environment,Oxford University, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad (IEB), Instituto de Sistemas Complejos de Valparaíso (ISCV), International Institute for Sustainability, Manaaki Whenua—Landcare Research, Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology,Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research,Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Programa de Pós Graduacão em Ecologia,Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio Conservation and Sustainability Science Centre,Department of Geography and the Environment,Pontifical Catholic University, Royal Botanic Gardens,Kew, School of Geography,Planning and Spatial Sciences,University of Tasmania, School of Zoology,Faculty of Life Sciences,Tel Aviv University, Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity,Department of Biology,Aarhus University, Siberian Federal University, The Nature Conservancy, The Santa Fe Institute, UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, World Resources Institute
Количество экземпляров:
Твёрдая копия издания отсутствует в фонде библиотеки
