Abstract
Background
Evidence from controlled trials and meta-analyses suggests that laparoendoscopic rendezvous (LERV) is preferable to sequential treatment in the management of common bile duct stones.
Materials and methods
With this retrospective analysis of a prospective database that included consecutive patients treated for cholecystocholedocholithiasis at our institution between January 2007 and July 2015, we compared LERV with sequential treatment. The primary endpoint was global cost, defined as the cost/patient/hospital stay, and the secondary end points were efficacy and morbidity. Fisher’s exact test or Mann–Whitney test was used.
Results
Of a total of 249 consecutive patients, 143 underwent LERV (group A) and 106 a two-stage procedure (group B). Based on an average cost of €613 for 1 day of hospital stay in the General Surgery Department, the overall median cost of treatment was €6403 for group A and €8194 for group B (p < 0.001). Operative time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay was significantly longer for group B (p < 0.001). No mortality in either group was observed. The postoperative complications rate was significantly higher in group B than in group A (24.5 vs. 10.5%; p = 0.003). No significant difference in the postoperative pancreatitis rate or the number of patients with increased serum amylase at 24 h was observed in either group.
Conclusion
Our study suggests that LERV is preferable to sequential treatment not only in terms of less morbidity, but also of lower costs accrued by a shorter hospital stay. However, the longer operative time raises multiple organizational issues in the coordination of surgery and endoscopy services.

References
Menezes N, Marso LP, Debeaux AC, Muir IM, Auld CD (2000) Prospective analysis of a scoring system to predict choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg 87:1176–1181
Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O’Sullivan GC (2004) A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 239:28–33
NIH Consensus Conference (1993) Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 269:1018–1024
Perniceni T, Slim K (2001) Quelles sont les indications vlidées de la coelioscopie en chirurgie digestive. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 25:B57–B70
Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2013) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD003327.
Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, Faggioni A, Ribeiro M, Jakimowicz J, Visa J, Hanna GB (1999) E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13:952–957
Carr-Locke DL et al (2002) Therapeutic role of ERCP in the management of suspected common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 56:170–174
Cavina E, Franceschi M, Sidoti F, Goletti O, Buccianti P, Chiarugi M (1998) Laparoendoscopic, “rendezvous”: a new technique in the choledocholithiasis treatment. Hepatogastroenterology 45:1430–1435
Lella F, Bagnolo F, Rebuffat C, Scalambra M, Bonassi U, Colombo E (2006) Use of laparoscopic-endoscopic approach, the so-called rendezvous technique in cholecystocholedocholithiasys. A valid method in cases with patient-related risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Surg Endosc 20:419–423
Morino M, Baracchi F, Miglietta C, Furlan N, Ragona R, Garbarini A (2006) Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones. Ann Surg 244:889–896
Rabago LR, Vicente C, Soler F, Delgado M, Moral I, Guerra I, Castro JL, Quintanilla E, Romeo J, Llorente R, Vazquez Echarri J, Martinez-Veiga JL, Gea F (2006) Two-stage treatment with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) compared with single-stage treatment with intraoperative ERCP for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis with possible choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy 38:779–786
Tsovaras G, Baloyiannis I, Zachari E, Symeonidis D, Zacharoulis D, Kapsoritakis A, Paroutoglou G, Potamianos S (2012) Laparoendoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative ERCP and laparoendoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecystocholedicholithiasis: interim analysis of a controlled randomized trial. Ann Surg 255:435–439
Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Famiglietti F, Moja L, Morino M (2013) Laparoendoscopic rendezvous reduces perioperative morbidity and risk of pancreatitis. Surg Endosc 27:1055–1060
La Greca G, Barbagallo F, Sofia M, Latteri S, Rusello D (2010) Simultaneous laparoendoscopic rendezvous for the treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 24:769–780
De Palma GD, Angrisani L, Lorenzo M, Di Matteo E, Catanzano C, Persico G, Tesauro B (1996) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), and common bile duct stones (CBDS) extraction for management of patient with cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 10:649–652
Moroni J, Haurie JP, Judchak I, Fuster S (1999) Single-stage laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis: a novel approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:69–74
Tricarico A, Cione G, Sozio M, Di Palo P, Bottino V, Tricarico T, Tartatglio A, Iazzetta I, Sessa E, Mosca S, De Nucci C, Falco P (2002) Endolaparoscopic rendezvous treatment: a satisfying therapeutic choice for cholecystocholedocolithiasis. Surg Endosc 16:711–713
Sanjay P, Kulli C, Polignano FM, Tait IS (2010) Optimal surgical technique, use of intra-operative cholangiography, and management of acute gallbladder disease: the results of a nation-widde survey in the UK and Ireland. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:302–306
Clayton E, Connor S, Alexakis N, Leandros E (2006) Metaanalysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 93:1185–1191
Hunter JG (1992) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration. Am J Surg 163:53–65
Saccomani G, Durante V, Magnolia MR, Ghezzo L, Lombezzi R, Esercizio L, Stella M, Arezzo A (2005) Combined endoscopic treatment for cholelithiasis associated with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 19:910–914
R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna-A. http://www.R-project.org
Ding X, Zhang F, Wang Y (2015) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon 13:218–229
La Greca G, Barbagallo F, Di Blasi M, Chisari A, Lombardo R, Bonaccorso R, Latteri S, Di Stefano A, Russello D (2008) Laparoendoscopic, “rendezvous” to treat cholecystocholedocolithiasis: effective, safe and simplifies the endoscopist’s work. World J Gastroenterol 14:2844–2850
Williams GL, Vellacott KD (2002) Selective operative cholangiography and perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a viable option for choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 16:465–467
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Aldo Garbarini, Dario Reggio, Simone Arolfo, Marco Bruno, Roberto Passera, Giorgia Catalano, Claudio Barletti, Mauro Salizzoni, Mario Morino, Luca Petruzzelli, and Alberto Arezzo have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garbarini, A., Reggio, D., Arolfo, S. et al. Cost analysis of laparoendoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 31, 3291–3296 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5361-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5361-4