Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Goal-setting paradoxes? Trade-offs between working hard and working smart: The United States versus China

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article proposes a model of the impact of goal difficulty and goal specificity on selling behaviors (selling effort, adaptive selling, and sales planning) and hence sales and behavior performance. The model suggests that goal-setting factors may have opposing effects on different sales behaviors. The empirical findings suggest that goal difficulty positively influences selling effort while negatively influencing adaptive selling behaviors. The results show that goal difficulty and goal specificity both have opposite effects on the two dimensions of working smart: adaptive selling and sales planning. The findings support the need for sales managers to account for the cultural context of the salesperson when determining optimal goal-setting strategies. With data collected from salespeople in the United States and China, the cross-cultural differences regarding the effects of goal-setting factors are also proposed and empirically supported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, Sanjeev, Thomas E. Decarlo, and Shyam B. Vyas. 1999. “Leadership Behavior and Organizational Commitment: A Comparative Study of American and Indian Salespersons.”Journal of International Business Studies 30 (4): 727–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James C. and David W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.”Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, Scott J. and Terry S. Overton. 1977. “Estimating Non-Response Bias in Mail Surveys.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (August): 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, James T. and Jeffrey B. Vancouver. 1996. “Goal Constructs in Psychology: Structure, Process, and Content.”Psychological Bulletin 120 (3): 338–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, Richard P. and Utpal Dholakia. 1999. “Goal Setting and Goal Striving in Consumer Behavior.”Journal of Marketing 63 (Speciale Issue): 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Youjae Yi, and Lynn W. Phillips. 1991. “Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research.”Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (September): 421–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, Robert S. 1986. “Distraction-Conflict Theory: Progress and Problems.” InAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology. Ed. L. Berkowitz. New York: Academic Press, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, Douglas N. and William D. Perreault. 1982. “Measuring the Performance of Industrial Salespersons.”Journal of Business Research 10 (September): 355–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Stephen P., William L. Cron, and John W. Slocum Jr. 1997. “Effects of Goal-Directed Emotions on Salesperson Volitions, Behavior, and Performance: A Longitudinal Study.”Journal of Marketing 61 (January): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Robert A. Peterson. 1994. “The Effect of Effort on Sales Performance and Job Satisfaction.”Journal of Marketing 58 (April): 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Tom J., John C. Mowen, D. Todd Donavan, and Jane W. Licata. 2002. “The Customer Orientation of Service Workers: Personality Trait Effects on Self- and Supervisor Performance Ratings.”Journal of Marketing Research 39 (February): 110–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Donald J. 1984. “The Effects of Goal-Contingent Payment on the Performance of a Complex Task.”Personnel Psychology 37 (1): 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, Charles S. and Michael F. Scheier. 1982. “Control Theory: A Useful Conceptual Framework for Personality-Social, Clinical, and Health Psychology.”Psychological Bulletin 92 (1): 111–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. 1985. “Family Influence on School Achievement in China.”U.S.-China Friendship 9: 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirkov, Valery, Richard M. Ryan, Youngmee Kim, and Ulas Kaplan. 2003. “Differentiating Autonomy From Individualism and Independence: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Internalization of Cultural Orientations and Well-Being.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84 (1): 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, Jhinuk. 1993. “The Motivational Impact of Sales Quotas on Effort.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (February): 28–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, N. 1972. “Social Facilitation.” InExperimental Social Psychology. Ed. C. McClintock. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 185–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cravens, David W., Thomas N. Ingram, Raymond W. LaForge, and Clifford E. Young. 1993. “Behavior-Based and Outcome-Based Salesforce Control Systems.”Journal of Marketing 57 (October): 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, Douglas J. and William L. Cron. 1998.Sales Management Concepts and Cases, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Susan P. and Samuel C. Craig. 1983.International Marketing Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, Christopher P., Terry Connolly, and Goran Ekegren. 1989. “Goals Strategy Development and Task Performance: Some Limits on the Efficiency of Goal Setting.”Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (1): 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Brian C. Perry. 1987. “Work Plan Availability and Performance: An Assessment of Task Strategy Priming on Subsequent Task Completion.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 39 (3): 279–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Pauline Wojnaroski, and William Prest. 1987. “Task Planning and Energy Expended: Exploration of How Goals Influence Performance.”Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (1): 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, Eric M. 1984. “Ambiguity as Strategy in Organizational Communication.”Communication Monographs 51 (September): 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing, David W. and James C. Anderson. 1988. “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (May): 186–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudykunst, William B., Yuko Matsumoto, Stella Ting-Toomey, Tsukasa Nishida, Kwangsu Kim, and Heyman Sam. 1996. “The Influence of Cultural Individualist-Collectivism, Self-Construals, and Individual Values on Communication Styles Across Cultures.”Human Communication Research 22 (June): 510–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Stella Ting-Toomey 1988.Culture and Interpersonal Communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Edward T. 1976.Beyond Culture. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkins, S. and J. Jackson. 1985. “The Role of Evaluation in Eliminating Social Loafing.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 11 (4): 457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt Assocaties. 2001. “Hot Topics in Sales Management and Sales Compensation.”Hewitt Associates Press Release, June 19, pp.1–3.

  • Hofstede, Geert. 1997.Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworksi, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli. 1991. “Supervisor Feedback: Alternative Types and Their Impact on Salespeople’s Performance and Satisfaction.”Journal of Marketing Research 28 (May): 190–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, Ruth and Phillip L. Ackerman. 1989. “Motivational and Cognitive Abilities: An Integrative/Aptitude Treatment Intraction Approach to Skill Acquisition.”Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (4): 657–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Howard J. 1989. “An Integrated Control Theory Model of Work Motivation.”Academy of Management Review 14 (2): 150–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, Gary P. and Edwin A. Locke. 1991. “Self-Regulation Through Goal-Setting.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 212–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liefeld, John P., Marjorie Wall, and Louise A. Heslop. 2000. “Cross-Cultural Comparison of Consumer Information Processing Styles.” InCross-National Consumer Psychographics. Ed. Lynn R Kahle. New York: International Business Press, 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, Edwin A. 1968. “Toward a Theory of Task Motivation and Incentives.”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 3 (May): 157–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Dong-Ok Chah, Scott Harrison, and Nancy Lustgarten, 1989. “Separating the Effects of Goal Specificity From Goal Level.”Organizational Behavioral and Human Decision Processes 43 (2): 270–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Gary P. Latham. 1990.A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Karyll M. Shaw, Lisa M. Saari, and Gary P. Latham. 1981. “Goal-Setting and Task Performance.”Psychological Bulletin 90 (1): 125–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, Michele. 2000. “The Art of Setting Sales Quotas.” InSales & Marketing Management 152 (April): 101.

  • Marks, Ronald, Douglas W. Vorhies, and Gordon J. Badovick. 1996. “A Psychometric Evaluation of the ADAPTS Scale: A Critique and Recommendations.”Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 16 (Fall): 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mento, Anthony J., Robert P. Steel, and Ronald J. Karren. 1987. “A Meta-Analytic Study of the Effects of Goal Setting on Task Performance 1966–1984.”Organizational Behavioral and Human Decision Processes 39 (1): 52–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, Christine. 1990. “The Effects of Stimulus and Consumer Characteristics on the Utilization of Nutrition Information.”Journal of Consumer Research 17 (December): 362–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, James C. and Daniel R. Ilgen. 1984. “Goal-Setting: A Theoretical Analysis of a Motivational Technology.”Research in Organizational Behavior 6 (6): 95–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ping, Robert A., Jr. 1995. “A Parsimonious Estimating Technique for Interaction and Quadratic Latent Variables.”Journal of Marketing Research 32 (August): 336–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, Kathleen K. and Ben Enis. 1990. “Establishing a Company-Wide Customer Orientation Through Persuasive Internal Marketing.”Management Communication Quarterly 3 (February): 376–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossano, Matt J. and Wendy P. Reardon. 1999. “Goal Specificity and the Acquisition of Survey Knowledge.”Environment and Behavior 31 (May): 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, Abhik, Peter G. P. Walters, and Luk T. K. Sherriff. 2001. “Chinese Puzzles and Paradoxes: Conducting Business Research in China.”Journal of Business Research 52 (2): 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Susanne G. and Reginald A. Bruce. 1994. “Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model to Individual Innovation in the Work-place.”Academy of Management Journal 37 (June): 580–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, Christina E. 1995. “Effects of Coaction, Expected Evaluation, and Goal Setting on Creativity and Productivity.”Academy of Management Journal 38 (2): 483–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Si, Gangyan, Sabine Rethorst, and Klaus Willimczik. 1995. “Causal Attribution Perception in Sports Achievement: A Cross-Cultural Study on Attributional Concepts in Germany and China.”Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 26 (September): 537–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Ken G., Edwin A. Locke, and David Barry. 1990. “Goal-Setting, Planning and Organizational Performance: An Experimental Simulation.”Organizational Behavioral and Human Decision Processes 46 (1): 118–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, Rosann L. and Barton A. Weitz. 1990. “Adaptive Selling: Conceptualization, Measurement and Nomological Validity.”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (February): 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and William D. Perreault. 1979. “Influence Use by Industrial Salesmen: Influence Strategy Mixes and Situational Determinants.”Journal of Business 52 (July): 435–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M. and Hans Baumgartner. 1998. “Assessing, Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 25 (June): 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujan, Harish. 1986. “Smarter Versus Harder: An Exploratory Attributional Analysis of Salespeople’s Motivation.”Journal of Marketing Research 33 (February): 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Barton A. Weitz, and Nirmalya, Kumar. 1994. “Learning Orientation, Working Smart, and Effective Selling.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tubbs, Mark E. 1986. “Goal Setting: A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Empirical Evidence.”Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (3): 474–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usunier, Jean-Claude. 1996.Marketing Across Cultures, 2d ed. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, Barton A., Harish Sujan, and Mita Sujan. 1986. “Knowledge, Motivation, and Adaptive Behavior: A Framework for Improving Selling Effectiveness.”Journal of Marketing 50 (October): 174–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Robert and Albert Bandura. 1989. “Social Cognitive Theory in Organizational Management.”Academy of Management Journal 16 (3): 362–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, and Trevor C. Bailey. 1990. “Mechanisms Governing Organizational Performance in Complex Decision-Making Environments.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 46 (2): 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Patrick M. and Michele K. Kacmar. 1994. “Goal Specificity as a Determinant of Goal Commitment and Goal Change.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 59 (2): 242–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Missouri, Missouri, USA

    Eric Fang, Robert W. Palmatier & Kenneth R. Evans

Authors
  1. Eric Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert W. Palmatier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kenneth R. Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Eric Fang (efe92@mizzou.edu) is an assistant professor of marketing at Seattle University. His current research interests are in the areas of relationship marketing in business-to-business context, markting strategy, and international marketing. He has articles published and accepted at theJournal of Business Research, theJournal of International Marketing, andAdvances in International Marketing.

Robert W. Palmatier (rpalmatier@missouri.edu) is a doctoral candidate in marketing at the University of Missouri, Columbia. He received his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in electrical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and an MBA from Georgia State University. He has 15 years of professional work exprience, including various sales and marketing and senior executive positions in the United States and Europe. His current research interests are in relationship marketing and value-creation strategies focused in a business-to-business and channels context.

Kenneth R. Evans (evansk@missouri.edu), Ph.D., is a professor of marketing and associate dean of graduate studies in the College of Business at the University of Missouri, Columbia. He holds the Pinkney C. Walker Professorship in Teaching Excellence. His research interests are in the areas of marketing management, sales/sales management, marketing theory, and services marketing. He has published in theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, theJournal of Business Research, and theJournal of Advertising, to name but a few. In addition, he has a number of articles that have been published in proceedings and presented at national conferences. He is either a member of the editorial review boards or serves in an ad hoc reviewer capacity for a variety of journals such as theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Industrial Marketing Management, theJournal of Retailing, and theJournal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. He currently serves as the associate editor of theJournal of Personal Selling and Sales Management.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fang, E., Palmatier, R.W. & Evans, K.R. Goal-setting paradoxes? Trade-offs between working hard and working smart: The United States versus China. JAMS 32, 188–202 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303261413

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303261413

Keywords