Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

DNA damage-induced centrosome amplification occurs via excessive formation of centriolar satellites

Oncogene volume 32, pages 2963–2972 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Centrosome amplification is a frequent phenomenon in malignancies and may facilitate tumorigenesis by promoting chromosomal instability. On the other hand, a centrosome inactivation checkpoint comprising centrosome amplification leading to elimination of cells by mitotic catastrophe has been described in response to DNA damage by ionizing radiation or cytostatic drugs. So far, the exact nature of DNA damage-induced centrosome amplification, which might be overduplication or fragmentation of existing centrosomes, has been controversial. To solve this controversy, we have established a method to distinguish between these two possibilities using A549 cells expressing photoconvertible CETN2-Dendra2. In response to various DNA-damaging treatments, centrosome amplification but not fragmentation was observed. Moreover, centrosome amplification was preceded by excessive formation of centrin-containing centriolar satellites, which were identified as de novo-generated atypical centrin dots staining positive for centriolar satellite markers but negative or only weakly positive for other established centrosomal markers, and which could be verified as centriolar satellites using immunogold electron microscopy. In line with this notion, disruption of dynein-mediated recruitment of centrosomal proteins via centriolar satellites suppressed centrosome amplification after DNA damage, and excessive formation of centriolar satellites could be inhibited by interference with Chk1, a known mediator of centrosome amplification in response to DNA damage. In conclusion, we provide a model in which a Chk1-mediated DNA damage checkpoint induces excessive formation of centriolar satellites constituting assembly platforms for centrosomal proteins, which subsequently leads to centrosome amplification.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nigg EA, Raff JW . Centrioles, centrosomes, and cilia in health and disease. Cell 2009; 139: 663–678.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Doxsey S, Zimmerman W, Mikule K . Centrosome control of the cell cycle. Trends Cell Biol 2005; 15: 303–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zyss D, Gergely F . Centrosome function in cancer: guilty or innocent? Trends Cell Biol 2009; 19: 334–346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Löffler H, Lukas J, Bartek J, Krämer A . Structure meets function--centrosomes, genome maintenance and the DNA damage response. Exp Cell Res 2006; 312: 2633–2640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Krämer A, Mailand N, Lukas C, Syljuåsen RG, Wilkinson CJ, Nigg EA et al. Centrosome-associated Chk1 prevents premature activation of cyclin-B-Cdk1 kinase. Nat Cell Biol 2004; 6: 884–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krämer A, Lukas J, Bartek J . Checking out the centrosome. Cell Cycle 2004; 3: 1390–1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bärenz F, Mayilo D, Gruss OJ . Centriolar satellites: busy orbits around the centrosome. Eur J Cell Biol 2011; 90: 983–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kubo A, Sasaki H, Yuba-Kubo A, Tsukita S, Shiina N . Centriolar satellites: molecular characterization, ATP-dependent movement toward centrioles and possible involvement in ciliogenesis. J Cell Biol 1999; 147: 969–980.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dammermann A, Merdes A . Assembly of centrosomal proteins and microtubule organization depends on PCM-1. J Cell Biol 2002; 159: 255–266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kubo A, Tsukita S . Non-membranous granular organelle consisting of PCM-1: subcellular distribution and cell-cycle-dependent assembly/disassembly. J Cell Sci 2003; 116 (Part 5): 919–928.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lopes CA, Prosser SL, Romio L, Hirst RA, O'Callaghan C, Woolf AS et al. Centriolar satellites are assembly points for proteins implicated in human ciliopathies, including oral-facial-digital syndrome 1. J Cell Sci 2011; 124 (Part 4): 600–612.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kodani A, Tonthat V, Wu B, Sutterlin C . Par6 alpha interacts with the dynactin subunit p150 Glued and is a critical regulator of centrosomal protein recruitment. Mol Biol Cell 2010; 21: 3376–3385.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krämer A . Centrosome aberrations – hen or egg in cancer initiation and progression? Leukemia 2005; 19: 1142–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganem NJ, Godinho SA, Pellman D . A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability. Nature 2009; 460: 278–282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Levis AG, Marin G . Induction of multipolar spindles by X-radiation in mammalian cells in vitro. Exp Cell Res 1963; 31: 448–451.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fetner RH, Porter ED . Multipolar mitosis in the Kb (Eagle) human cell line and its increased frequency as a function of 250 Kv X-irradiation. Exp Cell Res 1965; 37: 429–439.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sato C, Kuriyama R, Nishizawa K . Microtubule-organizing centers abnormal in number, structure, and nucleating activity in x-irradiated mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 1983; 96: 776–782.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hut HM, Lemstra W, Blaauw EH, Van Cappellen GW, Kampinga HH, Sibon OC . Centrosomes split in the presence of impaired DNA integrity during mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 2003; 14: 1993–2004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yih LH, Tseng YY, Wu YC, Lee TC . Induction of centrosome amplification during arsenite-induced mitotic arrest in CGL-2 cells. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 2098–2106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Takada S, Kelkar A, Theurkauf WE . Drosophila checkpoint kinase 2 couples centrosome function and spindle assembly to genomic integrity. Cell 2003; 113: 87–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Löffler H, Bochtler T, Fritz B, Tews B, Ho AD, Lukas J et al. DNA damage-induced accumulation of centrosomal Chk1 contributes to its checkpoint function. Cell Cycle 2007; 6: 2541–2548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bourke E, Dodson H, Merdes A, Cuffe L, Zachos G, Walker M et al. DNA damage induces Chk1-dependent centrosome amplification. EMBO Rep 2007; 8: 603–609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sibon OC, Kelkar A, Lemstra W, Theurkauf WE . DNA-replication/DNA-damage-dependent centrosome inactivation in Drosophila embryos. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2: 90–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bourke E, Brown JA, Takeda S, Hochegger H, Morrison CG . DNA damage induces Chk1-dependent threonine-160 phosphorylation and activation of Cdk2. Oncogene 2010; 29: 616–624.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Robinson HM, Black EJ, Brown R, Gillespie DA . DNA mismatch repair and Chk1-dependent centrosome amplification in response to DNA alkylation damage. Cell Cycle 2007; 6: 982–992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. White RA, Pan Z, Salisbury JL . GFP-centrin as a marker for centriole dynamics in living cells. Micros Res Techniq 2000; 49: 451–457.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gurskaya NG, Verkhusha VV, Shcheglov AS, Staroverov DB, Chepurnykh TV, Fradkov AF et al. Engineering of a monomeric green-to-red photoactivatable fluorescent protein induced by blue light. Nat Biotechnol 2006; 24: 461–465.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kobayashi T, Martensen T, Nath J, Flavin M . Inhibition of dynein ATPase by vanadate, and its possible use as a probe for the role of dynein in cytoplasmic motility. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1978; 81: 1313–1318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao H, Watkins JL, Piwnica-Worms H . Disruption of the checkpoint kinase 1/cell division cycle 25A pathway abrogates ionizing radiation-induced S and G2 checkpoints. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 14795–14800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Prosser SL, Straatman KR, Fry AM . Molecular dissection of the centrosome overduplication pathway in S-phase-arrested cells. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 29: 1760–1773.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Löffler H, Fechter A, Matuszewska M, Saffrich R, Mistrik M, Marhold J et al. Cep63 recruits Cdk1 to the centrosome: implications for regulation of mitotic entry, centrosome amplification, and genome maintenance. Cancer Res 2011; 71: 2129–2139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Habedanck R, Stierhof YD, Wilkinson CJ, Nigg EA . The Polo kinase Plk4 functions in centriole duplication. Nat Cell Biol 2005; 7: 1140–1146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Leidel S, Delattre M, Cerutti L, Baumer K, Gonczy P . SAS-6 defines a protein family required for centrosome duplication in C. elegans and in human cells. Nat Cell Biol 2005; 7: 115–125.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Boutros R, Lobjois V, Ducommun B . CDC25B involvement in the centrosome duplication cycle and in microtubule nucleation. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 11557–11564.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Stevens NR, Roque H, Raff JW . DSas-6 and Ana2 coassemble into tubules to promote centriole duplication and engagement. Developmental cell 2010; 19: 913–919.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Heilig CE, Löffler H, Mahlknecht U, Janssen JW, Ho AD, Jauch A et al. Chromosomal instability correlates with poor outcome in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes irrespectively of the cytogenetic risk group. J Cell Mol Med 2010; 14: 895–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Birgit Hub and Sigrid Heil for excellent technical assistance, and Andrew M Fry, Andreas Merdes, Jeffrey L Salisbury and Richard B Vallee for important reagents. This work was supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe (grant 108560).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Department of Internal Medicine V, Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Hematology/Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    H Löffler, A Fechter, F Y Liu & A Krämer

  2. Carl Zeiss Application Center, Heidelberg, Germany

    S Poppelreuther

Authors
  1. H Löffler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. A Fechter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. F Y Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. S Poppelreuther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. A Krämer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Krämer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Oncogene website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Löffler, H., Fechter, A., Liu, F. et al. DNA damage-induced centrosome amplification occurs via excessive formation of centriolar satellites. Oncogene 32, 2963–2972 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2012.310

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2012.310

Keywords

Search

Advanced search

Quick links