Skip to main content
Log in

The Competencies of Regions – Canada's Clusters in Biotechnology

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knowledge-intensive industries tend to concentrate geographically, because of the many spillovers that they generate. Thus new biotechnology firms often set up in regions that have innovative firms, government laboratories and universities, which attract them to enter. In this paper we unveil some of the characteristics of Canadian clusters in biotechnology: the key regions, their relative importance, and the main firms and government laboratories that attract new entrants. Moreover, we develop the concept of regions as nexus of competencies, a notion already put forward for firms, but that may be relevant to regions within nations and, ultimately, to nations as well. Capabilities of organizations and regions vary, and a thorough study of organizational and regional capabilities should precede the analysis of knowledge spillovers.

Toronto is the main center of biotechnology in Canada, followed by Montreal, and Vancouver. The total population of the metropolitan area (a proxy for immediate market size and venture capital) explains the size, location and characteristics of most Canadian clusters. University research is also a key factor explaining the size of the biotechnology clusters, once population is held constant.

Within nations, scientific and technical competencies vary strongly among regions. Some regions within countries concentrate a disproportionate share of the capabilities of all developed and developing nations. Moreover, regions tend to concentrate competencies on a few domains of expertise. This is what literature calls "agglomeration effects": companies active in the same field of technology tend to cluster geographically. They do so in order to share a common labor pool, and to obtain ready access to research institutions such as government laboratories and universities, or to key markets and customers, such as large assemblers or government facilities (Feldman et al., 1999). The specialized literature calls these institutions and key markets/customers "entry attractors" (Swan et al., 1998).

In many types of science-based industries (SBIs), such as biotechnology, information technology and advanced materials, the major attractors are universities and government laboratories. In a few more mature SBIs, including aerospace and aircraft, large assemblers tend to naturally attract smaller producers of, components and specialized software.

In this respect Canada is similar, to other nations (Niosi, 2000). Its competencies cluster around a few large and medium-sized urban agglomerations, such as Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Ottawa, Edmonton, and Calgary. Specialized clusters have also developed around smaller cities. This study builds a theory of the competencies of regions using biotechnology as a case study. Government laboratories, as well as universities and a few large firms, attract entry. The goal of the paper is to examine – using quantitative data – the relative competencies of regions in biotechnology, and the role of NRC laboratories and university research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonelli, C., 1986, L'Attività Innovativa in un Distretto Tecnologico, Turin: Fondazione Giovanni Agnelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIOTECanada Biotechnology Directory, 1998, Contact Canada.

  • Dosi, G. and L. Marengo, 1995, 'Some Elements of an Evolutionary Theory of Organizational Competencies', in R. W. England (ed.), Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 157-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, T., 1998, 'The Alchemy of Competence', in G. Hamel et al. (eds.), Strategic Flexibility, New York: Wiley, pp. 303-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C. (ed.), 1997, Systems of Innovation, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M., 1999, 'The New Economics of Innovation, Spillover and Agglomeration: Review of Empirical Studies', Economics of Innovation and New Technology 8(1–2), 5-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. (ed.), 1997, Resources, Firms and Strategies, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. and C. Knudsen, 1996, Towards a Competence Theory of the Firm, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. and C. K. Prahalad, 1994, Competing for the Future, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., 1999, 'Firm Formation and Regional Spillovers-Evidence from Germany', Economics of Innovation and New Technology 8(1–2), 27-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauteville, B., J. A. Héraud and M. Humbert (eds.), 1997, Technologie et Performances Économiques, Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héraud, J.-A. et al., 1997, 'Réseaux d'Innovation et Tissu Industriel Régional', in B. Hauteville, J. A. Héraud and M. Humbert, Technologie et Performances Économiques, Paris: Economica, pp. 97-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G., 1993, Economics and Evolution, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-A. (ed.), 1992, National Systems of Innovation, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A., 1920, Principles of Economics, 8th edition (reprint), Macmillan: London, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, M. and Associates, 2000, Venture Capital Deals Done and Disclosed 1999, Ottawa.

  • Montgomery, C. (ed.), 1995, Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm. Towards a Synthesis, Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niosi, J., 1995, Flexible Innovation, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niosi, J., 2000, Canada's National System of Innovation, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottawa Economic Development Corporation, 1998, Ottawa Facts.

  • Perroux, F., 1982, Dialogue des Monopoles et des Nations, Grenoble: Presses de l'Université de Grenoble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M., 1999, Small Firms and Network Economies, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevezer, M., 1998, 'Clustering in Biotechnology in the U.S.A.', in P. Swan, M. Prevezer and D. Stout (eds.), The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 124-193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. L., 1991, 'The Origins and Dynamics of Production Networks in Silicon Valley', Research Policy 20(5), 423-438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohet, S., 1998, 'Clustering and U.K. Biotechnology', in P. Swan, M. Prevezer and D. Stout (eds.), The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 194-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M., 1993, 'The Limits to Globalization: Technology Districts and International Trade', Economic Geography 68(1), 60-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, P., M. Prevezer and D. Stout (eds.), 1998, The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsumo, S., 1986, The Technopolis Strategy, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., G. Pisano and A. Shuen, 1997, 'Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management', Strategic Management Journal 18(7), 509-533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., 1994, 'Strategy and the Search for Rents: The Evolution of Diversity Among Firms', in R. P. Rumelt et al. (eds.), Fundamental Issues in Strategy, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 228-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., 1991, The Future of Materials Science: The Engineering Connection, A presentation to IMI on the 75th anniversary of the NRC: Montreal.

  • Winter, S., 1987, 'Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets', in D. J. Teece (ed.), The Competitive Challenge, New York: Harper and Row, pp. 159-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S., 1989, 'Patents in Complex Contexts: Incentives and Effectiveness', in V. Weil and J. W. Snapper (eds.), Owning Scientific and Technical Information, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 41-60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niosi, J., Bas, T.G. The Competencies of Regions – Canada's Clusters in Biotechnology. Small Business Economics 17, 31–42 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011114220694

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011114220694

Keywords